Search for: "In re Mark L. (1983)" Results 101 - 120 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Dauphin Co. 1999).Naturally, we're most interested in the recall cases involving prescription medical products. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Id. at *4 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Id. at *4 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Id. at *4 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
CFPB, Justice Kagan accused the majority of deploying an “anti-power-concentration principle” to declare the agency’s single-director structure unconstitutional.[2] She then quipped, without citation, that “[i]f you’ve never heard of a statute being struck down on that ground, you’re not alone. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
Cir. 2005) (holding that a court may "rely on extrinsic evidence, such as expert testimony," to determine whether the claims are indefinite) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Seattle Box Co., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]