Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 121 - 140
of 29,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
See In re White, 73 USPQ2d 1713 (TTAB 2004). [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
This time,the Bundesgerichtshof noted that the outcome of the second appeal turned on the interpretation of Article 15(1) of Regulation 40/94 [which was repealed and re-enacted as Regulation 207/2009 over four years ago, but never mind]. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:31 pm
” In re Mavety Media Grp. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:22 pm
MARK STEYN: Thus the courage of the secular left: If you’re going to be “provocative”, it’s best to do it with people who can’t be provoked. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:05 am
In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc., 2016 WL 2786364 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:39 am
At Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield reviews Mark Herrmann's new book: Inside Straight: Advice about Lawyering, In-House and Out, That Only the Internet Could Provide-- Mark's posts, much like the Curmudgeon's Guide, offers thoughts and advice that can be read on two levels. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:49 am
Just choose a name or design that reflects your passion, search the USPTO database to see that it’s free and (application in hand) you’re on the path to registration, right? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:16 am
See In re Nett Designs Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 10:49 am
Mark the date, you’re invited! [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:58 am
The post A Steep Climb to Own a One Word Mark? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:10 am
In other words, 3-stripes and you're out! [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
In any event, the Court found that those elements do not suffice to counterbalance the clear differences existing between the conflicting marks on a conceptual level.In addition, the Court noted that the marks did not share the concept of a ‘fruit with a bite taken out of it’ [So, what you're saying is we can have an apple but we can't take a bite out of it? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
" In 1998, Mattel considered supplying those toys, but could not due to the expense of re-tooling to meet its standards. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
In re Vienna Sausage Mfg. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
Merck judges (2) Vioxx lawsuit advertising (0) Think different—think litigious (0) Party like you’re a tobacco lawyer (0) [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 12:21 am
Re-emphasis on “use” As China is a first-to-file country in terms of trade mark prosecution, rush registration and trade mark squatting has long been a cause of headache for multi-national corporations operating in China. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:15 am
On August 12, 2018, Kranz-Marks passed away. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 9:19 pm
If you tell the truth, the chances are you're going to remain unemployed, on the dole. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:29 pm
Unless a plaintiff can describe the underlying facts from which a court can infer that the seller intended to falsely mark the product, a false marking complaint will likely not pass the test of In re BP Lubricants. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:25 am
The White Cliffs of Dover Author Walter Mittelholzer 1894-1937 Jane Lambert Trade Marks Registry (Ms A Skilton) Re VERA LYNN, Lynn v Halewood International Brands Ltd, BL O/766/19 12 Dec 2019 Dame Vera Lynn was born in 1917 and is still going strong. [read post]
