Search for: "In re Michael L. (1985)" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm by Robert Bennett
Of course, the easy selection would be Michael Nifong, the former District Attorney for Durham, North Carolina who was motivated by his own re-election and engaged in unethical, and probably criminal, conduct in the prosecution of three Duke University Lacrosse players. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
No matter what the number of the Trust, it makes no difference in litigation, except that the pleadings are different between the three law firms that have been prosecuting these cases in Texas: Regent and Associates (older cases), Michael J. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:45 pm by Bill Henderson
See Russell Korobkin, “Harnessing the Positive Power of Rankings: A Response to Posner and Sunstein,” 81 Ind L J 35, 42-43 (2006). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
For example, Roger Hood, Stephen Shute, Martina Feilzer, and Aidan Wilcox (2002) found that only 7% of those released from prison for a sex offence were re-convicted for another sex offence within four years. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
Reading Time: 23 minutes Balancing act.My partners Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss, and I recently shared thoughts concerning public corruption trials. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Hantz[6] employee, Michael Laursen, received checks from customers and deposited such checks into his own personal account, which was as a separate commercial account that appeared to be set up by Laursen in the name of “Henry Firearms Service. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The owners of A&L Salvage Landfill, 11225 state Route 45, agreed Tuesday to a preliminary injunction that will result in a proper closure of the former construction- and demolition-debris landfill. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It wasn’t until Bill C-34 was re-introduced as Bill C-2 (39-1) in 2007 that the Federal Accountability Act, and the Conflict of Interest Act the following year, turned these principles were turned into statute. [read post]