Search for: "In re NS" Results 1 - 20 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 8:20 am by Kurt Bassuener
That agreement allowed elections in the city to resume after 12 years, but only by essentially re-dividing it between the parties who split it to begin with. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
  One of the more interesting manifestations of the role of religion within political life is that of the priests of the practitioners of the old religions of Africa as re-established in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in Marxist-Leninist Cuba. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
In re Charter Commc’ns, Inc., (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Appellee’s Br. 23 (citing Conde Nast Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
Publ’ns, Inc.[1] and Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co.,[2] both of which were rendered before the advent of the Internet. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
Publ’ns, Inc.[1] and Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co.,[2] both of which were rendered before the advent of the Internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:06 am by Tom Smith
If you’re willing to listen to what I at least believe I’ve learned, then pour yourself a long, stiff drink and strap in. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
There are strong arguments that the narrow reading of Article 40.6.1(i) and the implication of an unenumerated right into Article 40.3.1 were unnecessary, and that all of the constitutional protections for freedom of speech should be (re-)integrated into Article 40.6.1(i) (see Tom Daly “Strengthening Irish Democracy: A Proposal to Restore Free Speech to Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution” (2009) 31 Dublin University Law Journal (ns) 228 (academia); Robert… [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 9:49 am by Tom Smith
Since you’re stubbornly old fashioned, you decide to check it out at BezosMart on the way home from work today before you get it delivered by drone to your tiny apartment. [read post]
’ Background on the Direct Product Rule Under the traditional “national security” direct product rule outlined in Section 734.9 of the EAR, a non-U.S. made item is subject to the EAR when the non-U.S. made item is: (i) the direct product of U.S. technology or software that is controlled for national security (NS) reasons (or a major component of a plant that is the direct product of NS-controlled technology or software), (ii) the resulting non-U.S. made item is… [read post]