Search for: "In re Newman"
Results 81 - 100
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 11:28 pm
The opinion, written by Judge Moore and joined by Judge Newman and District Court Judge Joseph Farnan of the District of Delaware, sitting by designation, reads in its entirety as follows:In light of our decision in In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:59 pm
Biogen IDEC is a separate explication of "additional views" by Chief Judge Rader (at right) joined by Judge Newman. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:04 am
You can announce your new status with a divorce ring, writes Andrew Adam Newman in today’s New York Times. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:06 pm
In a discussion I was having prior to the election, Paul Newman's The Verdict came up and it brought to mind the closing argument of Newman's character Frank Galvin, and then I saw it on Fox Movie Channel this evening: You know, so much of the time we're just lost. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:52 pm
” Michael Barclay writes “Judge Newman sure likes patents. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:37 am
JEFFREY NEWMAN, A FORMER PROSECUTOR IS A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWYER WITH THE FIRM NEWMAN & SHAPIRO. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 8:35 am
From: Brett Newman [mailto:bnewman@helpwithliens.com] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 10:40 AMTo: 'Jeremy Babener'Subject: RE: NYU Law Student: Confirming InformationImportance: High Jeremy The Lien resolution Group handles Liens. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:22 am
“We’re cut from the same cloth,” Newman said, “and he is assuming more risk with a new franchisor. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:34 am
By Dennis Crouch In re Shared Memory Graphics LLC (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:12 pm
In re Newman, 189 Mich App 61 (1991). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:17 am
You're out of order! [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:03 am
I had read the opinion years ago, but re-encountered it for a class several weeks ago, and noticed the really unusual way Judge Newman uses the term “Internet. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:15 pm
In re Ferguson (Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
The ’141 application of CONSTANTIN EFTHYMIOPOULOS relates to methods of treating orpreventing influenza by administering the drugzanamivir1 by oral inhalation.Judge Newman's dissent in In re EFTHYMIOPOULOS concludes:It was undisputed that, at the time of this invention,it was believed that the influenza virus infected primarilythe upper respiratory tract, that is, the nasal passages. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:47 pm
Josh Newman sure is. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:37 am
Baxter appealed an obviousness finding from a re-examination proceeding. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
” The facts of this case readily distinguish it from In re Yale, 434 F.2d 666 (CCPA 1970), where our predecessor Court of Customs and Patent Appeals found that the inclusion of the molecule CF3CF2CHClBr in a list of anesthetics was an obvious error. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
Tamara noted, in part, “You would think we would [charge more] because we’re taking on the exposure of another party, but oddly we do not. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:37 pm
” Simply put, listen so you will know what people “want to hear, what they’re capable of understanding. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:32 am
There is a very unsettling back story behind why Judge Newman was challenged and in our opinion whether or not it is true, Judge Newman clearly deserves to be re-elected. [read post]
