Search for: "In re Olson" Results 21 - 40 of 985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2008, 7:06 pm
They re-arrested her at LAX last night and she's back in custody. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
" While Olson appears to have in mind an amicus brief by the ACLU and other gay rights groups, his funding organization, the American Foundation For Equal Rights, has objected to anoth form of support that Olson carefully avoids mentioning - the motion of gay rights groups to intervene.Asked about the rationale for challenging Prop. 8 in federal court, Olson said,Not everyone is going to agree with the legal strategy, but we think we are at the right place at the… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:37 pm by MorelliRatner
After the thoroughly depressing experience of wading through Erwin Chemerinsky’s newish book, The Conservative Assault on the Constitution, we’re ready for some good news.read more [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
“We’re prepared, willing and able to move as fast as the judge is willing to go. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 12:16 pm
Whenever the Law Blog writes about Olson, we’re saddled with his lengthy epithet — former solicitor general, current Gibson Dunn partner and leading conservative lawyer. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:56 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is Walter Olson’s post “NAGPRA, Indian Burials, and the Unquiet Grave. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:46 pm by Kevin
Yes, I realize there could conceivably be parallel universes or multiverses in which arguably the same Ted Olson could be billing on a theoretically infinite number of timesheets, but now you're just being ridiculous. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:21 pm by LawDiva
In fact, when Olson’s suit is dismissed, I think it would be just to order Olson to pay court costs in the amount of at least $7000.00. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The final result in the re-exam of US 6,991,298: the previous decision is modified in that the rejections of claims 1-9,11-15 are overcome;claims 17-30, 44-53, 58, and 101-114 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 4:26 am
Olson isn't the only American male who was gladdened by this news. [read post]
Now, if you're considering including a top-up option in your next deal, remember to read Olson v Ev3 before you get started. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:55 am
Walter Olson asks what we’re getting from our medical malpractice system — with “jury trials, contingency fees, lack of loser-pays, extensive lawyer-driven discovery” — that Canada, at 10% of the cost for its medical malpractice system does not. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:34 pm by Tom Smith
“You’re saying this isn’t covered by it,” Scalia continued.That’s right, Olson responded. [read post]