Search for: "In re Richard T. (1978)" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
It can also be understood as shared perceptions of the meaning of reality backed by massive background consensus (Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms (William Rehg (trans) MIT Press, 1996); pp. 22, 322); or as biopolitics (the narratives through which social and political power may be normalized over the control and management of the bodies of the living and their relationship to physical and abstract objects and the technologies of control) (Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics:… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
California didn’t start enforcing the rule on reefers until December 2009. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Vineet Agarwal and Richard Taffler: "Comparing the Performance of Market-Based and Accounting-Based Bankruptcy Prediction Models" (Abstract ID: 968252):Recently developed corporate bankruptcy prediction models adopt a contingent-claims valuation approach. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:22 am by Nicolas Lamp
In many instances, developing countries were not part of the negotiations until the basic outlines of the codes had been hammered out by the US and the EC; in fact, in some cases (specifically, the codes on anti-dumping and civil aircraft) the developing countries didn’t even find out that codes were being negotiated until the final stages of the Round. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
[T]he original elements in the plot of a play or novel may be a substantial part, so that copyright may be infringed by a work which does not reproduce a single sentence of the original. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
EEOC, 434 U.S. 412 (1978), the Supreme Court outlined the principles that guide a district court's discretion when it decides whether to grant attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant in a Title VII case. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
In Ozkok, the BIA modified its precedent and established a three prong test for a conviction to be a conviction for immigration purposes: All three prongs had to be met: the judge or jury has found the alien guilty or he has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty;  The judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the person ‘s liberty to be imposed (including but not limited to incarceration,… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am by velvel
No. 95-763, at 1 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 764, 764. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
While many consider these general principles to be a secondary source of international law that “may be invoked as supplementary rules… where appropriate” (14), some consider them on an “footing of formal equality with the two positivist elements of custom and treaty”. (15) Examples are the principles of res judicata, equity, justice, and estoppel. [read post]