Search for: "In re S.E"
Results 121 - 140
of 620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
I blogged about this sealing controversy on Jan. 28, and I thought I'd pass along the just-filed memorandum supporting the motion to unseal. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Smith tells us that Jason Daubert “briefly mulled reopening his case when Diclegis, the updated version of Bendectin, was re-approved. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:44 pm
In re Superior Court Order, 315 N.C. 378 (1986) (applying standard to disclosure of bank records); In re Brooks, 143 N.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 11:20 am
Now we’re making national news because of this fool? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:03 pm
Boise Creek Grocery, 46918 244th Ave S.E., Enumclaw, WA, was closed on Nov. 13 at 10:10 a.m. for operating without a valid permit. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
In In Re: Z.A.K., 189 N.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
The Rider re-opened three days later at 2:30 p.m., Jan. 6. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
., 801 S.E.2d 595 (Ga. 2017). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:27 am
” Woomer, 277 S.C. at 175, 284 S.E.2d at 359. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:49 am
The rule originated with In re Marriage of Patterson, 22 Kan. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
Criminal contempt upheld for recording court proceedings in violation of courtroom policy and warnings not to do so; the judge was not required to recuse himself in hearing the contempt proceeding and had the authority to sentence the defendant to probation In re Eldridge, ___ N.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
It’s quite short, so we recommend reading it in full if you’re considering a diminished value claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
[An interesting court opinion, though I think on balance mistaken.] [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
This post provides summaries of the published criminal opinions issued by the North Carolina Supreme Court on September 27, 2019, and the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2019. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
As to her estate, Plaintiff testified on re-direct and re-cross concerning her purchase of a rental property for roughly $95,000 with money loaned to her by a friend. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
App. 539, 540, 648 S.E.2d 862, 864 (2007). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
App. 1, 13, 707 S.E.2d 724, 733 (2011). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
Duncan, 366 N.C. 544, 546, 742 S.E.2d 799, 801 (2013) (“An order that completely decides the merits of an action therefore constitutes a final judgment for purposes of appeal even when the trial court reserves for later determination collateral issues such as attorney’s fees and costs. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
App. 605, 753 S.E.2d 176 (2014), discussed below. [read post]
