Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. " Results 1 - 20 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
We’re proud to partner with the State Bar of Texas in this effort. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
Houston Court of Appeals holds that (re)litigation of the counterclaims was barred because arb award had res judicata effect, and affirms adverse summary judgment on counterclaims. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:37 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Crow Iron Works, 582 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Tex.1979) (stating res judicata requires cause "finally determined, without appeal"). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nike states:we affirm the [ND Tex] district court’s judgment that the trade secret claims are barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:17 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
     Because [party] argues that the issues here were first decided in a federal tribunal, federal law controls the determination of whether res judicata will bar the later state court proceeding. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Sykes, 136 S.W.3d 635, 640 (Tex. 2004) (stating that "a dismissal constitutes a final determination on the merits of the matter actually decided"); Ritchey v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am by Wolfgang Demino
HSI relies on In re Empire Pipeline Corporation to support its position that HTI's attempts to use evidence from the mediation is barred. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
HSI relies on In re Empire Pipeline Corporation to support its position that HTI's attempts to use evidence from the mediation is barred. [read post]
23 May 2012, 10:47 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
See Barr, 837 S.W.2d at 628 (stating res judicata bars related matters that, with the use of diligence, should have been litigated in prior suit). [read post]