Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support"
Results 201 - 220
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 7:49 am
Galloway Township previously had laws in place stating sex offenders can’t live within 2,500 feet of those types of areas, prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
(And if the jury has any brains, will never be used again) Meanwhile back in real life, thanks to the Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizen’s United case, we are seeing a tsunami of secret corporate campaign cash drowning our democracy. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 1:56 am
“But when the United States Supreme Court upheld civil commitment and sex offender registries and all of that, they talked about it as civil and as not criminal. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
You’re thinking two things. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court in the landmark Alaska v John Doe case. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
I also campaign regularly for courts to publish more judgment summaries and press releases as the Supreme Court now does to great effect. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:37 pm
Ten years of debate and there is still insufficient evidence to support lawful access. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:06 pm
Galloway Township previously had laws in place stating sex offenders can’t live within 2,500 feet of those types of areas, prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
What they’re trying to gain here is an expansion of trade mark law. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:28 am
Terrell, who was previously appointed to a Family Court Steering Committee by the Supreme Court of Florida, believes Crestview was a particularly well-suited location in which to begin the program. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:02 am
This was greeted with a swathe of erroneous stories along the lines that fathers were being denied a right to see their children.Then we finally got the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v Kernott, only six months after it was heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:13 am
Against a backdrop of a 35-year low in U.S. death sentences, Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul E. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:18 am
The new Family Court Rules of Procedures and Practice are based on best practices in domestic and child welfare cases in Kentucky courts. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
State-Wide — Pennsylvania Supreme Court — 1 Retention Only one Supreme Court position is on the ballot, and it’s the retention voter for Justice J. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
http://j.st/pFi In re Attorney's Fees of BettencourtCourt: Hawaii Supreme Court Docket: SCAP-30616 October 19, 2011 Judge: McKenna Areas of Law: Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law In the case underlying this appeal, the circuit court appointed Appellant David Bettencourt to represent a client in a criminal case. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Upon review, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that HHS was required to contract with the Tribe and regarding the contract start date, but reversed the court's decision regarding contract support costs. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert changed practice by holding that Rule 702 required gatekeeping, and by generally slighting Rule 703. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court Judicial Conference Committee on Federal-State Jurisdiction and the Arkansas Supreme Court Committees on Technology, Child Support, and Foster Care. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
See Notes of Advisory Committee to Rule 11. [read post]
