Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 81 - 100 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
To do this, however, courts have had to ignore both Supreme Court precedent and the clear language of Rule 702. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:11 am by Jessica Rich and Darby Hobbs
  With the Supreme Court seemingly reluctant to alter the scope of Section 230, will Congress tackle this issue in a serious way? [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:28 am by Cindy Cohn
We’re thankful for our roughly 38,000 members who not only support us financially but spring into action whenever it's needed. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:49 am by SO Issues
Galloway Township previously had laws in place stating sex offenders can’t live within 2,500 feet of those types of areas, prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:52 am
Supreme Court reversed a death sentence for a Georgia man convicted of raping a woman, calling it an "excessive penalty for the rapist, who as such, does not take human life. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
United States, however, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court and held that a tribe has “inherent sovereign authority” over any activity on a reservation that impacts the welfare of the tribe. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:13 am by PaulKostro
” Id. at 125, quoting Supreme Court’s Judiciary-Surrogates Liaison Committee, Guidelines for Court-Appointed Attorneys in Incompetency Matters, 1 (1995). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:45 am by Michael Geist
The committee process did provide some valuable information - confirmation of the effectiveness of the notice-and-notice system, the broad support for a digital lock exception for non-infringing purposes (including consumer groups, education, libraries, retailers, and telecom companies), and the value of codifying the Supreme Court of Canada's fair dealing test into the Copyright Act to address uncertainty concerns. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:16 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Court of Appeal for the 8th Circuit affirmed, and Missouri petitioned the Supreme Court for review. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Baker, County Court Judge, dismissed the indictment with leave to re-present. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Pete Stark, D-Calif., re-introduced the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” H.R. 4806 (previous bill, H.R. 3827). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am by Ken Chasse
An equally important reason for creating a much more sophisticated and competent legal research facility for the legal profession, is the need of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada and the provincial and territorial Courts of Appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
Seeking to neutralize the issue, President Clinton, standing for re-election, announced his support for DOMA. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But in fact, hearteningly, that quote comes from a recent ruling by the Vermont Supreme Court! [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times “The Supreme Court on Wednesday began debating whether state legislators have the power to set federal voting rules without oversight from state courts, in what would be a fundamental change in the way elections are conducted. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:45 am
Full report: Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:02 am
This was greeted with a swathe of erroneous stories along the lines that fathers were being denied a right to see their children.Then we finally got the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v Kernott, only six months after it was heard. [read post]