Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice"
Results 141 - 160
of 737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:13 am
Supreme Court.] [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:22 am
"Our research team figured out the factors that are most predictive of defendants' likelihood of missing court or being re-arrested, and in particular being re-arrested for a violent crime," he said. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm
If they’re sincere, they’re setting themselves up for disappointment when EARN IT’s sponsors refuse to fix its problems. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Phillips says that there need not have been a longstanding practice of disclosures of this sort for it to be a permissible exercise of the court’s power. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
Baltimore City Criminal Court, 407 U.S. 355, 32 L. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Mark Bennett pointed out six months ago how Gamso didn’t even mention his role in getting the Ohio Supreme Court to strike down as unconstitutional the state’s sex-offender-registration statute. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See In re Erie COVID-19 Business Interruption Protection Insurance Litigation, No. 1:21-mc-1 (W.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am
Endnotes [1]Ohio Sentencing Commission Ad Hoc Committee on Bail issued a report in June 2017. https://www.sc.ohio.gov/Boards/Sentencing/resources/commReports/bailPretrialSvcs.pdf Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice O’Connor has now formed another committee to study bail. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:34 pm
Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of her client Walter Rothgery. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), in the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:12 am
Supreme Court decisions bar courts from jailing people simply because they are too poor to pay their fines. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
Merritt’s colleague appeared at the Supreme Court as a government agent, in a public courtroom, where he articulated an official agency position. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
As part of his forum non conveniens analysis, the Court specifically referenced the “important and atypical practical considerations” described by Vice Chancellor Parsons in In Re The Bear Stearns Cos. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 7:04 am
It seemed like something that shouldn’t be allowed to go on, and I was surprised that the Court of Criminal Appeals accepted that as just some practice that’s okay.Amanda: I mean what surprised me is that this is a practice that’s been going on for decades. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
The Michigan Supreme Court took this stance regarding an attorney in a publicized criminal trial, Peisner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
The Michigan Supreme Court took this stance regarding an attorney in a publicized criminal trial, Peisner v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
The Michigan Supreme Court took this stance regarding an attorney in a publicized criminal trial, Peisner v. [read post]
