Search for: "In re William B. (1982)" Results 81 - 93 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
Sugarman, “The Re-emergence of Silica Litigation and the Theories of Liability Under Which it is Litigated,” HarrisMartin (Feb. 24, 2004); Thomas A Gilligan, Jr., “Is Silica The Next Asbestos? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Claims under Federal and State Racketeering Acts And Other Civil Remedies There are three types approaches to civil remedies a defendant might pursue to inhibit the flow of false claims in products cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Six years later, in 1982, another FDA panel recommended that PPA be considered safe and effective for appetite suppression in dieting. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Israel, when faced with the prospect of being arrested for disorderly conduct, observed, “and you would think we would be complaining, but we’re not. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
(I re-numbered the paragraphs below to start with 1 ... also, the endnotes matter a great deal in this discussion.)***1. [read post]