Search for: "In the Matter of: FITNESS HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC." Results 21 - 40 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2007, 5:03 am
  Today's post describes another successful cross-selling effort that I wrote about for Law Firm Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collecting cases); Icon Health & Fitness,Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm by Charles Bieneman
  More courts have followed the approach of Computer Associates International, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Paul Stephan
For the court, it mattered that presidents had entered into these kinds of international agreements since the dawn of the republic without ever encountering congressional pushback. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am by Saloni Khanderia
In this case, parties relied on the holdings and observations of International Shoe Co., the Zippo Test of “sliding scale”, Cybersell Inc. and the effects test in Calder, among multiple other American cases on the same issue. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL OFFICE TOWER IN HOUSTON Relators Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court decided Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
Arrow International, Inc., 2011 WL 780684, slip op. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:01 pm by Charles Bieneman
Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995), the court extracted the principle that expression had been held unprotectable where an idea or concept would have been useless without it. [read post]