Search for: "In the Matter of Bott" Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2021, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:59 pm by Emily Dai
The committee will hear testimony from David Vladeck, professor and faculty director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law and former director of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Bureau of Consumer Protection; Morgan Reed, president of the App Association; Maureen Ohlhausen, partner and section chair of Antitrust & Competition Law at the FTC; Baker Botts; former acting chairman of the FTC; and Ashkan Soltani, independent researcher and technologist and former chief… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
” “Though AT&T claims the three attorneys — Kevin Cadwell, formerly of Baker Botts, and Akin Gump alumni David Clonts and Michael Reeder — worked on matters that were ‘substantially related’ to the patent in this case, Network Apps said in its motion AT&T’s argument ‘quickly unravels under the proper legal standard.'” “‘In the context of patent litigation, when neither the patent nor the accused product… [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:21 pm by Will Baude
Marshall acknowledged that matters lawfully assigned to the discretion of the executive branch were beyond the scope of judicial review. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
In 2001, Miller Cassidy merged with Baker Botts, a larger, Texas-based firm, and Barrett spent another year there before leaving for academia. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:29 am by Adam Faderewski
October 30 titled “Black Lawyers Matter: Strategies to Enhance Diversity and Inclusion. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am by Liz Dunshee
Baker Botts earned bragging rights with Jude Dworaczyk’s “Penny the Hair Bow Aficionado” representing the firm. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a matter of statutory interpretation, the Justices looked for some link to other statutes: JUSTICE GINSBURG: Is there any other federal statute that provides for attorneys’ fees on the basis of the word “expenses” alone? [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:38 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘Jones Day is switching sides and attacking former clients on the very matters the firm represented them on, mandating disqualification without a signed and knowing waiver of the conflict by PHTF,’ the motion said. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Apr. 26, 2019).While the resolution of the case pivots on issues of contract law in the leasing context, the lengthy portion of the opinion addressing the matter of attorneys fees [see cut & pasted below] will have much broader impact across a wide array of practice areas. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
While claiming to merely “clarify” its prior precedents on the matter, and acknowledging no major break with the longstanding Arthur Andersen fee-factors framework, the Texas high court will have accomplished much more. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:12 pm by Stan Gibson
Takeda moved to disqualify Baker Botts from representing Zydus based on Baker Botts’ alleged previous representation of Ethypharm S.A. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:00 am by Race to the Bottom
First, the BBFA Report makes recommendations regarding an appropriate tax plan for the industry—a matter which is not addressed by the TSC Report. [read post]