Search for: "In the Matter of Jenrette"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 2:16 pm
Henry was previously managing director of investment banking with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette/Credit Suisse First Boston in Hong Kong as well as the chair of a large international law firm’s China practice. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:02 am
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 3:53 am
” Yudell v Gilbert, 99 AD3d I 08, 114 (I st Dept 2012), quoting TooleyvDonaldwn, Lufkin &.Jenrette, Inc., 845 A2d 1031, 1033 (Del 2004). [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
LEXIS 1031, citing Matter of Boddy, 950 F2d 334). [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:05 am
LEXIS 1031, citing Matter of Boddy, 950 F2d 334). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031, 1033 (Del. 2004) [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:38 am
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
” Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc., 124 Ill. 2d at 447-48. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:18 am
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031, 1035 (Del. 2004). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
James was Chairman of Global Investment Banking and Private Equity at Credit Suisse First Boston, and Chairman of the Banking Group at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
James was Chairman of Global Investment Banking and Private Equity at Credit Suisse First Boston, and Chairman of the Banking Group at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:49 am
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d, 1031, 1033 (Del. 2004). [read post]
23 May 2009, 1:12 pm
Unfortunately for the plaintiffs, the Court found that their claims under Gentile failed as a matter of law because “the Complaint states in conclusory fashion that the [e]ntity [d]efendants ‘controlled the NSC board of directors,’ but the Complaint is devoid of any facts demonstrating an agreement or that the [d]efendants were tied together in some legally significant way”. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
Consequently, the claim for breach of the duty of loyalty failed as a matter of law and was dismissed. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004)] is similar to that articulated by the American Law Institute (ALI) in its Principles of Corporate Governance ¶ 7.01 and provides that the court must look to the nature of the wrong, to whom the relief should go, the independence of the direct injury to any injury to the company, and that the plaintiff can show that the duty breached was owed to the plaintiff and that the plaintiff can prevail without showing a harm to… [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
As a general matter, the Section suggests that the Draft Provisions avoid duplicating or potentially undermining the Company Law or the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (the “Civil Procedure Law”), and urges that the SPC ensure that the Draft Provisions will be interpreted in a way that does not create such ambiguity or conflict. [read post]
