Search for: "In the Matter of Michael H. Weinstein"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
Kurian II and Timothy H. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Program and Jackson H. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:09 am
That goes back to the 19th century: 1877 H. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Dwyer, a young, earnest immunologist who had done some contract work on an unrelated matter for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a defendant in the litigation. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:55 am
Michael McConnell Prof. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Gurun (University of Texas at Dallas), and Quoc H. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm
Seligman [Picked by Fred H. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
H. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am
The counter-revolution of let it all in, under the guise of finding challenges to expert witness opinion as going to “weight not admissibility,” or to inventing “presumptions of admissibility” should be seen for what they are: retrograde and illiberal movements in jurisprudential progress. [1] See, e.g., Michael H. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Thus, Judge Jack Weinstein, writing after the death of Dr. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
In one of the sexual assault lawsuits against Harvey Weinstein, for instance, the court reasoned: The Court cannot accept Plaintiff's "mere speculation" that Weinstein's defense would not be prejudiced by the condition that he "not disclose her name to the public," with no clear definition of what would constitute disclosure to "the public. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Does it matter? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
” The authors begin their analysis of specific causation with a brief acknowledgement that our legal system could abandon any effort to set standards or require rigorous thinking on the matter by simply leaving the matter to the jury.[9] After all, this laissez-faire approach had been the rule of law for centuries. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
William H. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Michael D. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
” In other words the FDA’s risk assessment exists to guide agency action, not to determine a person’s risk or medical status.[10] As small and theoretical as the risks are, they are frequently based upon demonstrably incorrect assumptions, such as: humans are as sensitive as the most sensitive species; all organs are as sensitive as the most sensitive organ of the most sensitive species; the dose-response in the most sensitive species is a simple linear relationship; the linear… [read post]
