Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. C. T." Results 1 - 20 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 7:21 pm
  This is a matter of basic rationality, after all. 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Board’s decision was based on section 2(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But still talks about the goodwill P has built up, when generic terms maybe shouldn’t have goodwill b/c they’re not marks. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:46 am
Laramie County Dep't of Family ServicesCitation: 2007 WY 92Docket Number: C-06-8Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Keith G. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
(p. 636) Of course, these characteristics are plausible and in no way conflict with the rational actor model. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If result is thin protection for some that’s cool.McKenna: reason for excluding from © matters: if it’s b/c they aren’t original, existence of alternatives wouldn’t matter so much. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Court said that it was misleading of the P because the P represented that it wasn’t relying on the D’s representations in the contract. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am by Josh Blackman
I agree with Wittes: “[T]he only way we get answers is to ventilate such matters. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Ties into Qs of whether attribution matters. [read post]