Search for: "Individual John and Jane Does A-F" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am by Bridget Crawford
  How does this year's data compare to the numbers from prior years? [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Eve: After finding John Doe guilty of sexual violence against Jane Doe, Purdue University suspended him for an academic year and imposed conditions on his readmission. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's an excerpt from the facts: John Doe and Jane Roe were students at the University of Michigan. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:07 am by Daniel J. Hemel, Eric A. Posner
The Justice Department dismissed those allegations on various grounds, including that the citizens acted with the knowledge and tacit assent of President John F. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Most histories of the 25th Amendment begin in the moments after President John F. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
The Court will not dismiss the claims of Plaintiffs John Doe #8, Jane Does #9-10, John Doe #11, and David Ellis under Section 230 of the CDA. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  It focuses on the individual within a collective that is not the state. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Let’s say John Smith, a citizen of Connecticut, along with Jane Doe, a citizen of New Jersey, are co-members of Generic LLC, a New York limited liability company. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:12 am by Quinta Jurecic
Coast Guard Admiral Paul F. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Simple curiosity or a campaign of harassment could motivate police to look into where John Doe or Jane Roe frequented over the last weeks or months, and that prospect would seem undesirable from the point of view of the privacy that the Fourth Amendment protects from arbitrary intrusions.Fortunately for the Indiana court, it was able to cite modern U.S. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:27 am by Ben
But it does also indicate, on the other side, the extent of acts of 'piracy'. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
As a preliminary matter, the Plaintiffs did not allege that John and Jane Doe were individuals who wished to keep their identities private, and did not make an over breadth challenge, so the court granted to dismiss them as parties. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
See,  http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/International-Taxpayers/Options-Available-For-U-S-Taxpayers-with-Undisclosed-Foreign-Financial-Assets. [read post]