Search for: "Insurance Company Defending Defendant and Third-Party Defendant; Attorney Representing Both Insureds" Results 1 - 20 of 525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2014, 9:22 am by Mark S. Humphreys
However, if a person is being sued under an insurance policy, it is the insurance company who gets to choose the attorney. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:09 am by Allison Gomez
They prepare a settlement demand letter to send to the insurance company or at-fault party. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:29 am
Bendix (collectively Rivkin), who represented Galaxy in the underlying action, asserting legal malpractice, and also Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:15 am by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
Evaluate Your Business’s Insurance Coverage Along with evaluating the possibility of shifting liability to a co-defendant or other third party, businesses facing consumer fraud litigation should also evaluate their insurance coverage. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:18 am
  Most important, a third factor is whether the company’s interest is aligned with that of the person to whom the company is providing legal services. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:00 am
We have not represented an insurer for a good long while. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:56 pm by Michael Ehline
Breach of Duty To be successful in wrongful death cases, the plaintiff must be able to show that the at-fault party or insurance company owed the victim a duty. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:27 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
At the civil trial, he was represented in absentia by a trial attorney hired by his car insurance company. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 11:15 am by Robert May
They may attempt to shift the blame to a third party. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm by John C. Manoog III
In situations in which an injured worker is successful in a case against a third party, the employer’s insurance company may be  entitled to repayment for monies it has paid out to the worker. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v BARBARA J. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 12:10 am by Kevin LaCroix
In both cases, directors of the failed companies seek access to their company’s D&O insurance in order to defend themselves from claims following in the wake of their company’s failures. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:28 am by Dan Bressler
” — “Medidata submitted a claim for the loss under its insurance policy issued by the Defendant Federal Insurance Company (‘Federal’). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
In many cases, the defendant’s insurer will assume responsibility for its defense, and the parties will work out a settlement that is fully insured. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
 The act transforms CPLR 3101(f) by now requiring that "[a]ny defendant, third-party defendant, or defendant on a cross-claim or counter-claim shall provide to the plaintiff, third-party plaintiff, plaintiff on counter-claim, and any other party in the action within [60] days after serving an answer pursuant to [CPLR] rule [320] or section [3011] or [3019] of this chapter notice and proof of the existence and contents… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:37 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer works closely with employer and other plan sponsors, insurance and financial services companies, plan fiduciaries, administrators, and vendors and others to design, administer and defend effective legally defensible employee benefits and compensation practices, programs, products and technology. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 5:40 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
A recent decision by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals upholds the liability of auto insurance company GEICO in covering damages awarded to plaintiffs who won a $15 million verdict against GEICO’s insured. [read post]
Successful businesses may obtain coverage for both defense costs (attorneys’ fees) and indemnity (judgments, settlements). [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:35 pm by Patrick E. Knie
According to the court, the legislature’s intention – at least partially – was to prevent an insurance company like the defendant from reducing the amount of PIP coverage that it paid the insured simply because the insured received a payment from a third party for the same expenses. [read post]