Search for: "Insurance Company v. Foley"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
In Thomas, plaintiffs James and Roxanne Thomas claimed that GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, and GEICO General Insurance Company (collectively, “GEICO”) violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFA) by allegedly charging excessive private passenger automobile (PPA) insurance premium rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 12:51 pm
First National Insurance Company of America, 25 F.4th 1134 (9th Cir. 2022), a decision that the Fifth Circuit highlighted in Sampson as “particularly instructive. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 11:00 am
Agency, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Foley is available to assist in interpretation of any of the federal COVID assistance for your business and can help you find ways to claim and/or use available funding for your company. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
In this post, Richard Bamforth and Jessica Foley, who work within the litigation and arbitration group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd) [2020] UKSC 48, which concerns when an arbitrator should disclose circumstances which may give rise to justifiable doubts as to her or his impartiality. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
In this post, Richard Bamforth, Kushal Gandhi and Jessica Foley, who all work at CMS and have a special interest in arbitration, comment on the decision handed down last month by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:30 am
” (Foley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
Background The rule against reflective loss The rule that “reflective loss” cannot be recovered has its origins in Prudential Insurance Co Limited v Newman Industries Limited (No 2) [1982] Ch 204. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm
” “A spokeswoman for Foley wrote in an email that the firm declines comment on the allegations in Schumann/Steier Holdings v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
As we have previously reported, in April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a sweeping ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:31 am
See Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567 (1st Dept 1979). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:49 pm
The case of Trigg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
The Times can afford to pay, and in any event likely has insurance. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
The purpose of the statute of limitations is to expedite litigation and thereby discourage any delay of the presentation of stated claims which may greatly prejudice the defense of such claims, as in Insurance Company of North America v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
Kopko of the Foley, Comerford & Cummins insurance defense law firm in Scranton, Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
The lawsuit is pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.The law firm of Foley & Lardner was sued by its client, 1347 Property Insurance Holdings, Inc., for failing to secure non-compete agreements from key employees of a company that the client acquired. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Erie Insurance Exchange, No. 2016-CV-2431 (C.P. [read post]
