Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa." Results 81 - 100 of 339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 On March 27, 2019, the injured party requested Erie Insurance to reconsider its previous denial in light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
19 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
May 19, 2020 Ranjan, J.), Judge Ranjan of the Pennsylvania Western Federal District Court held that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v GEICO, in which that court ruled that the household exclusion was no longer valid, did not apply to invalidate a household exclusion in this case where the insured had waived UIM coverage on a motorcycle insured with another carrier. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
April 8, 2020 Beetlestone, J.), in which an Eastern Federal District Court Judge upheld and applied the Gallagher v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by vforberger
Able and available — the unemployment issue in play here — is required by federal law in a general sense but is specifically defined and applied under state law. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 7:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Feb. 27, 2020 Beetlestone, J.), the Court followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's sweeping decision in Gallagher and likewise held that the household exclusion was eradicated across the board.The court in Stockdale rejected the insurance company's argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion in Gallagher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Household ExclusionThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Unfortunately, in its haste to effectuate this change in the law, the Supreme Court in Sayles failed to provide trial court judges with any guidance on how to decide these more specific issues.Over the past year, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did rule in favor of an auto accident law defense position put forth in at least the case of Safe Auto Insurance v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 A motion to dismiss was also addressed in the federal court case of Piazza v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 6:57 am by Mike Worgul
The post PA DUI Law: Supreme Court Limits Birchfield appeared first on Worgul, Sarna & Ness, Criminal Defense Attorneys, LLC. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico rationale to defeat a Regular Use Exclusion was rebuffed by the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Barnhart v. [read post]