Search for: "Intellectual Ventures II LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 2:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Judges Lourie, Wallach and Stoll vacated and remanded a final written decision issued at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review (IPR) trial that patent claims owned by Intellectual Ventures... [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:15 am by John M. Rogitz
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a non-precedential decision in Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 101 (eligibility). [2] See Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
In the UK, PRS for Music and Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) confirmed that, following a strategic review commenced in 2015, the two companies would create a new joint venture focusing on serving all PPL and PRS for Music UK public performance licensing customers for both music and sound recording rights. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
The big news from Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 8:38 pm by Patent Docs
Directory Assistance Call Completion Is Not A Financial Service for CBM Purposes By Joseph Herndon -- On May 4, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a decision denying institution of a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review in a proceeding between AT&T Mobility and Intellectual Ventures, based on U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am by Arina Shulga
 Here is the list: Abundance Partners, Andreessen Horowitz, Baseline Ventures, Benchmark, Betaworks, Brand Foundry, Bullet Time Ventures, Capital, Freshtracks Capital, Claremont Creek Ventures, Collaborative Fund, CommonAngels Ventures, DBL Investors, Emerson Collective, First Round Capital, Forerunner Ventures, Formation|8, Founders Fund, Foundry Group, Generation Equity Investors, Good Capital, Greycroft Partners, Hallett Capital, Harrison… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The overview of the casePlaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and IntellectualVentures II LLC (collectively, “Intellectual Ventures ”)asserted infringement of claims of three patents againstdefendants Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Capital OneFinancial Corporation, and Capital One, NA (collectively,“Capital One”) . [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:06 am by Woodrow Pollack
Cir. 2011) (invalidating a patent that claimed a “method and system for detecting fraud in a credit card transaction between [a] consumer and a merchant over the Internet”); accord Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
LEMLEY, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco,CA, argued for defendants-appellants JP Morgan in the case INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by RatnerPrestia
When considering this venue, a patent challenger can minimize the risk of an unsuccessful PTAB decision spilling over to a district court litigation by (i) including ample explanation of the invalidity grounds within its petition, along with pinpoint citations to detailed expert declaration testimony, and (ii) advancing a narrow non-infringement claim construction when the construction is supported by an explicit definition in the patent specification or a disavowal in the prosecution… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 1:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Instead, they'll also find themselves defending their operations against entities backed by the resources and force of foreign governments – a very unfair battle of resources.As to IV, recall the history of US 6182894 :Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively,“IV”) sued PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. [read post]