Search for: "Interest of C.J.C." Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Robert Epstein
In the case of In re C.J.C., the Supreme Court of Texas found that the presumption that it is in the best interest of a child to award possession to a fit parent versus a non-parent extends to modification cases.[1] This decision is certain to be seen as a major win for parents, as the Court reinforced the long-held notion that in most cases, a parent having custody of their child is best for the child. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the words of McLachlin C.J.C. in Torstar, at para. 102, “[i]t is enough that some segment of the community would have a genuine interest in receiving information on the subject”: see also Torstar, at para. 105. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 7:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In the words of McLachlin C.J.C. in Torstar, at para. 102, “[i]t is enough that some segment of the community would have a genuine interest in receiving information on the subject”: see also Torstar, at para. 105. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm by Dan Michaluk
McLachlin C.J.C. and Abella J. wrote for the Court. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Francesca Blackard
The father argued the recent Texas Supreme Court case of In re C.J.C. required the court to grant the requested relief. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Francesca Blackard
The father argued the recent Texas Supreme Court case of In re C.J.C. required the court to grant the requested relief. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:03 am by Michael Geist
This is an unusual copyright case in that the injunction will, in part, silence criticism of the Aquarium and potentially stifle public debate on a topic of great interest to the community. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bragg Communications Inc., ([2012] 2 SCR 567), the Supreme Court of Canada, holding  that the privacy interests of a young girl conducting a defamation and cyberbullying action was greater than the interest of the media , allowed the plaintiff to conduct the proceedings under the letters “AB” To hold that there is a presumption  to notify the media appears to be inconsistent  with the established principles of the SCC  about the importance of the… [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
The standing decision stands for two major points: the CCLA’s expertise did not have to relate to the selling of gas or regulations governing it, but it was sufficient that it related to constitutional issues; and it had shown its interest by identifying its concerns to the government early, often and in many different ways. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
N.S.]. 39 The majority decision was written by McLachlin C.J.C. and supported by three other judges. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
the Queen was obliged by constitutional convention to accept the Prime Minister’s advice to prorogue Parliament therefore, the Prime Minister has a responsibility to consider all interests, including the interests of Parliament the question of whether the Prime Minister’s advice to prorogue Parliament was lawful is justiciable the boundaries of a prerogative power affecting Parliament are determined by “the fundamental principles of our constitutional law”,… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
  About six weeks after the accident, he advertised for witnesses in the information wanted section of a small neighbourhood paper. [23] Esson C.J.C. as he then was, in dismissing Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm by Matthew Nied
The case challenged the Court to strike an appropriate balance between the competing interests of freedom of expression and the protection of reputation in the new context of internet communications. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Appellate Decision: Appeal allowed (Finch C.J.C. dissenting). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
In doing so, they rely on Withler, a decision penned by McLachlin C.J.C. [read post]