Search for: "Invent Tech"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
The changes, in a broad sense, replaced dates of invention with “effective date”, thereby removing any semblance of a first-to-invent system. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The factors that are likely to tip the decision are the length of the provision (generally the longer, the less enforceable), the industry, or category of technology or invention involved (in some industries such as high-tech, trade secrets are short-lived), and the relative behavior of the parties (for example, it would be less enforceable if the employer customarily uses this provision to hassle ex-employees). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
References: Forbes (September 20, 2011) "New Patent Law Means Trouble for Tech Entrepreneurs" Smart Business (September 20, 2011) "The America Invents Act: A race to the patent office" [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
The Federal Circuit panel of Circuit Judges Jimmie Reyna, Evan Wallach and Todd Hughes found that the district court correctly determined that patent claim asserted by BSG Tech were invalid as abstract ideas lacking any inventive step under the Alice/Mayo framework... [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:52 am
This will help keep competitors from wasting resources on trying to develop the same invention. 3) Eliminate the "could have raised" clause for patent opposition. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
No. 09/822,261, Tech. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:21 am
Until they invent a battery that lasts forever, we're all at the mercy of our battery. [read post]
24 May 2023, 12:15 pm
The CAFC specifically upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) finding that the primary prior art reference cited by Medtronic did not qualify as prior art under pre-America Invents Act (AIA) first-to-invent provisions. [read post]
24 May 2023, 12:15 pm
The CAFC specifically upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) finding that the primary prior art reference cited by Medtronic did not qualify as prior art under pre-America Invents Act (AIA) first-to-invent provisions. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:00 pm
—attained their scale and reach primarily by buying out their potential competitors, not by inventing new technologies that were so amazing that they beat the competition… Something must be done about the way that tech abuses the press—but that something shouldn’t depend on tech’s eternal dominance. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Recently, Boeing has increased its unmanned aircraft tech holdings, and has also pursued R&D in unmanned underwater vehicles.... [read post]
8 May 2010, 3:25 pm
For years, he said, the university held potential commercialization hostage by failing to file patents but also failing to release the invention back to the researcher. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:34 pm
Seagate Tech. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
Bankrupt telecom equipment maker Nortel Networks plans to auction off a treasure trove of more than 6,000 high-tech patents next week. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Virtually all industries now use computer-implemented inventions in some way... [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:55 am
The major beneficiaries are not the patent trolls- but the thousands of single patent owners and small high tech start ups who for the first time ever-are able to monetize the enormous investments in time, money and ingenuity that they have made in their inventions. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
I’ve got a bunch of tech sites and features to talk about that range from the trivial to the not so trivial. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:15 am
Reaching out to Tech Transfer early and often will help researchers protect their accomplishments and receive the recognition they deserve. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:15 am
Reaching out to Tech Transfer early and often will help researchers protect their accomplishments and receive the recognition they deserve. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:37 pm
[…] Id. at *12-13 (internal citations omitted).Satisfaction of Form 18Requirements under Form 18Paragraph 3 of Form 18 requires, by way of an exemplary invention, a statement that “[t]he defendant has infringed and is still infringing the Letters Patent by making, selling, and using electric motors that embody the patented invention, and the defendant will continue to do so unless enjoined by this court. [read post]
