Search for: "Isaac v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 12:41 pm by Jason Shinn
The New York Times reported on May 12, 2017 (by Mike Isaac) the judge previously referred the case to the United States Attorney’s office for possible theft of trade secrets. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Pennsylvania may have gone mysteriously red in the dark of election night, but a federal judge in that state has just ruled that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Nick also analyzed how the iPhone’s TouchID feature intersects with the concept of a warrantless search as was determined in Riley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
We are happy to confirm that this was not the intended meaning, as indeed the article stated he is honest and hard working. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
Recent success in Syria and Iraq against the Islamic State might have negative consequences, Reuters reports. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
More commentary on Monday’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment, Daniel Hemel discusses United States v. [read post]