Search for: "Isaacs v. Wells et al" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On or about January 28, 2016, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action in this Court styled Hazel Carasco v City of New York, Consolidated Edison Company, and Halcyon Construction Company, et. al., under Ind. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:42 am by Rantanen
Merrill et al., A Patent System for the 21st Century, no. 7, 121 (2004). [2] See id. at 7. [3] U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
"[2] These voter protection laws seem to have covered threats not just of physical violence but also of legal coercion,[3] and they may have covered threats of economic retaliation as well—a similarly general 1854 English statute[4] was applied to threats of economic retaliation and not just those of physical attack.[5] The bans on threats, from 1721 to the 1860s, were included alongside bans on bribery; given that offering to provide a financial benefit in exchange for a vote… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 SCR 533 It is well understood that in Canada the grant of a patent is akin to a contract or bargain between the patentee on the one hand and the government of Canada (representing the interests of the general public) on the other. [read post]