Search for: "J. DOES, 1-99" Results 81 - 100 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of particular importance is a fundamental principle that has informed the law of agency and corporations for centuries; namely, the acts of agents, and the knowledge they acquire while acting within the scope of their authority are presumptively imputed to their principals (see Henry v Allen, 151 NY 1, 9 [1896] [imputation is "general rule"]; see also Craigie v Hadley, 99 NY 131 [1885]; accord Center, 66 NY2d at 784). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of particular importance is a fundamental principle that has informed the law of agency and corporations for centuries; namely, the acts of agents, and the knowledge they acquire while acting within the scope of their authority are presumptively imputed to their principals (see Henry v Allen, 151 NY 1, 9 [1896] [imputation is "general rule"]; see also Craigie v Hadley, 99 NY 131 [1885]; accord Center, 66 NY2d at 784). [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Here the following applies: procedural acts that were legally effective for the proceedings (verfahrensgestaltend schon rechtswirksam) and completed (e.g. the time limit for filing an opposition (TFO)) before the entry into force of the EPC 2000 on December 13, 2007, are to be decided on the basis of the old law (J 10/07 [1]; T 1172/04 [1], tempus regit actum). [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Dell Holdings Inc., 1997 CanLII 400 (S.C.C.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 32, at paras. 20-22, Cory J. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In so finding, the Enlarged Board has endorsed the prevailing view in the Boards' case law.The Enlarged Board further observes in its opinion that its answers to the referred point of law apply not only to appeals but also, by analogy, to similar situations, for instance in opposition proceedings (Article 99(1) EPC).The Enlarged Board issued its opinion in a seven-member composition. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the examination of admissibility pursuant to A 108 and R 99(2) does not depend on whether D5 is admitted into the proceedings (see above, [1.4]).[1.7] In its statement of grounds of appeal, filed within four months after delivery of the decision of the OD, the appellant has given a detailed statement that the impugned patent had to be revoked for lack of novelty and lack of inventive step and that this should be done on the basis of evidence D5.[1.8] Moreover, the… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Terrorism Prosecutions in Post-9/11 Canada Kent Roach, Professor and Prichard Wilson Chair in Law and Public Policy at the University of Toronto | antiterrorlaw.ca (2014) 40:1 Queen’s LJ 99 Excerpts: Introduction and Part I [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:39 pm
Price: €99, £88 or US$127). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:40 am
The leading early decision, J 21/80, was mistranslated from French into English. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Apart from that, the opinion 1/09, which has been issued in the meantime by the plenum of the ECJ on March 8, 2011, does not call for adopting another point of view.To read the whole decision (in German) or have a look at the file wrapper, click here. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:47 pm by Josh Wright
Crane, Chicago, Post-Chicago and Neo-Chicago, 76 University of Chicago Law Review (2009) William Page and Seldon J. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, res judicata does not bar this action without a valid and final judgment on the merits in a prior action. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:26 am by Schachtman
“Everybody complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
Because of the objective nature of the test in subsection (1), the issuing authority may be satisfied on the balance of probabilities as to the reasonable grounds even if the protected person denies, or does not give evidence about, fearing the commission of domestic violence. [read post]