Search for: "J. G.1"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 4:00 am
Bridget J. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Hodge (Arizona State University), Reminiscences on Public Health Law, 50(1) J. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Tye J. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:19 pm
The BIA today issued an interim decision in In re A-M-E J-G-U-, 24 IN Dec. 69 (BIA 2007). [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
J. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:02 am
Blaine Bookey, Gender-Based Asylum Post-Matter of A-R-C-G: Evolving Standards and Fair Application of the Law, 22 Southwestern J. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 1:50 pm
Briggs, J & G Foods Quality Assurance Manager, (508) 865-1101. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:18 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/NBZlH-tP--g" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:32 am
Amelia G. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 5:16 am
Gladin and Mark J. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am
The appellant requests the Enlarged Board to clarify in its decision the interpretation which it adopts.Concerning the legal context of the present issue, the EPC is a special agreement within the meaning of the Paris Convention (J 15/80, OJ EPO 1981, 213). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am
Aspects that should be considered are, in particular, how long the proceedings before the national courts or authorities have been pending, the duration of the suspension and whether the request for suspension of the grant proceedings was filed at a late stage (J 6/10, point 4.2 of the reasons; J 7/10, point 4.1 of the reasons; J 15/13, point 2.5 of the reasons; J 33/03, point 2.2 of the reasons).These criteria have not to be fulfilled cumulatively, and they may… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Rule 14 EPC 1973 can prevent, as lex specialis, other acts, e.g., as in J 20/05, the filing of a divisional application (see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], and J 9/12 [3,5]). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
G 3/92 [1]).[3.1.10] As the Board has decided in its decision J 33/03 [2.1], contrary to the decision to stay the proceedings according to Rule 14(1), it is in the discretion of the Office to decide whether the proceedings are to be continued under R 14(3). [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Immunol. [1971] 1:242; and J. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
See § 542.335(1)(j). [read post]
26 May 2008, 2:46 pm
R) Charles J. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 9:21 pm
J A Kemp will be offering a webinar entitled "Patentability of Simulations at the EPO" on June 30, 2021 at 16:00 pm BST (GMT+1). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm
G 5/83 [2-5]; G 1/07 [3.1]; G 2/08 [4]). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
, within the 1 month of entering the regional phase before the EPO .A question arising in the present case is whether reestablishment is available for the request for restoration of priority. [read post]
