Search for: "JAY v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Brian Wm. Higgins
This article was authored by Jay Lessler, Esq., of Blank Rome LLP                    The Supreme Court on April 18, 2012, held in Kappos v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
More interesting to me is the sentencing issue raised in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:37 am
" "The trial can be read in many ways: as gun victim versus gun seller, as city versus country, as red state versus blue state, and, as a version of David v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:51 am
" The NYT states that: "The first of the [interrogation] memos from August 2002 was signed by Jay S. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 7:43 am
"  In this excerpt, Loftus describes her testimony in a pretrial hearing in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm by Elizabeth Cummins, Esq.
The source of the disagreement stems from public school funding in light of recent state Supreme Court case McCleary v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ominously, in his recent judgment in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v GEDI Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) Jay J noted: “Only the Second Defendant saw fit to raise a forum non conveniens challenge in advance of 1 January 2021 and the relevant EU regulation no longer applying… I refuse this application without prejudice to the Second Defendant’s ability to restore it at an appropriate time should the need arise. [read post]