Search for: "JONES v. MERCK " Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Josh Blackman
The case is brought by Yaakov Roth of Jones Day, who was one of the lawyers involved with NFIB v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
For three years — from October 2006 through December 2009 — while I was a partner at Jones Day, I co-hosted the Drug and Device Law Blog with Jim Beck, of Dechert. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am by Bexis
  Way back in 1977, a plaintiff unsuccessfully sued the publisher of the Merck Manual. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm by Ron Coleman
For three years — from October 2006 through December 2009 — while I was a partner at Jones Day, I co-hosted the Drug and Device Law Blog with Jim Beck, of Dechert. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:23 am by Tom Lamb
The day before, April 17, this jury heard the closing arguments for both sides, which were presented by defense lawyers Christy Jones and Paul Strain on behalf of Merck, and by plaintiff attorneys Tim O'Brien and Gary London on behalf of Mrs. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 pm by INFORRM
The second basis for the application was the familiar Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946 jurisdiction to stop a claim that doesn’t serve the legitimate purpose of protecting the claimant’s reputation. [read post]