Search for: "Jackson County v. C. A. D."
Results 1 - 20
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2022, 8:02 am
The second case was Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division disagreed and citing Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, explained that the Board's determination did not collaterally estop Barber from denying Jackson's application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.The Appellate Division also commented that substantial evidence supports the determination denying [Jackson] benefits noting that §207-c entitled correction officers to benefits when… [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:23 am
Jackson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
§ 31-6-102(d) must meet the requirements of W.R.Cr.P. 41(c). [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
McCalla of The Spence Law Firm, LLC, Jackson, WY; and Jeremy D. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Although the County initially accommodated Jackson's limitation, in September 2013, the County notified Jackson that his "availability to work mandatory overtime [wa]s an essential function of [his] position" and that his "limited availability pose[d] a safety issue . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
Law Lessons from D’Agostino v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
P. 56(c). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
WAGNER, DDS, PC, d/b/a DENTAL CARE OF JACKSON HOLEDocket Number: S-12-0188URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspx Appeal from the District Court of Teton County The Honorable Timothy C. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:49 am
Docket Number: S-12-0096; S-12-0104URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Teton County, Honorable Timothy C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:06 pm
Law Lessons from Estate of Peter Muscle, by its Executrix, Linda Jackson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
D Dade County Includes the city of Trenton. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:13 am
Sergeant C. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:20 am
LEXIS 12994 (D. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
TED C. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
See image of Trustee's Deed recorded in the Harris County Clerk's Office below: FIRST THE DUNNING, THEN THE DEED Section 1692e(5) prohibits threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken, while Section 1692e(2) prohibits falsely representing . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Jackson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
See Huntington Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Jackson, 2008 U.S. [read post]