Search for: "Jackson v State of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 1,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed.When the dispute reached our state’s highest court, the New York State Court of Appeals determined that under New York Indian Law § 8, the County Court had no discretion to decide whether or not Tina Jackson was an intruder. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a conservative majority ended the constitutional right to abortion in Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by Howard Bashman
In other coverage, Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports that “Supreme Court Urged to Reject Mississippi’s Attack on Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:15 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Rules as to Admissibility of Evidence In Trial of Accused Al-Qaida Supporter United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
A court's review of a disciplinary arbitration award is limited and does not encompass consideration of the merits of the award or the penalty imposedMatter of State of New York v Civil Serv. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 1:10 am
New York City Transit Authority Subscription Required QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Court Finds JHO's Rulings Fair, Impartial; Defendant Denied De Novo Hearing People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:58 am
See Zeiler v Deitsch, CA2, 500 F.3d 157, [publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com]In G&G Shops, Inc. v NYC Loft Board, a New York State Supreme Court, decision not officially reported, the court considered another aspect administrative due process: the substitution of a hearing officer during an administrative proceeding.The initial hearing officer conducting a hearing involving G&G resigned during the course of the hearing. [read post]