Search for: "Jackson v. American Water Co." Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
I cannot say it better than one of our most admired Supreme Court Justices in one of the most important cases in American history, Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co., v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
One topical example: the leaked draft Supreme Court opinionpurporting to overrule Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Times-News, April 27, 2010 Feedlot co-owner Cory King and the other defendants charged by the state with more than 20 environmental violations have reached a settlement, defense attorneys announced today. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
"     On February 9, EPA Administrator Jackson testified that, "Chairman Upton's bill would, in its own words, "repeal' that scientific finding [i.e. greenhouse gas emissions threaten the health and welfare of the American people]. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Jackson, Civil Action No. 09–cv–02148–REB–MJW (D. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Jackson, in which the Court held by a vote of five to four that a challenge to an arbitration agreement is itself subject to arbitration; however, in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]