Search for: "Jackson v. Housing Authority of High Point"
Results 21 - 40
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
The last point is the result of three things: Civil lawsuits largely take too long; the executive branch controls criminal enforcement mechanisms; and Congress itself lacks any real enforcement mechanism—short of reviving its long-dormant authority to arrest people, which itself would pose a number of legal and practical problems. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
While claiming to merely “clarify” its prior precedents on the matter, and acknowledging no major break with the longstanding Arthur Andersen fee-factors framework, the Texas high court will have accomplished much more. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
The relationships between DOJ and the White House will need to be mended. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” Like with Nixon, there are no negative limits on Congress’s authority to include this conduct under the umbrella of “high Crimes. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
Trump v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:07 pm
Judge Jackson seems interested in this question—and appears to suggest the panel may lack jurisdiction over Trump’s claims that the committee has exceeded its authority—but the judges do not press counsel for either the House or the Archives to argue that the courtlacks jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
The Claimants lived in a house about half a mile away. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
” The High Court found: Ground 1 The Housing Needs Assessment was wholly inadequate The defendant’s interactions with the claimant in November 2022 were entirely inadequate. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Lynch (10th Cir. 2015) and Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Racial justice and interracial marriage circa 1954-55 Question: Not long after Brown was decided, the Warren Court declined to review Jackson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
The most high profile case of the week was the judgment of Nicol J in the case of Starr v Ward ([2015] EWHC 1987 (QB)). [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 9:02 am
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
But my modest point is that Congress is vested with the authority to determine, as a legal matter and not as a political antic, whether the president has committed a misdeed for which he may be impeached. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
" Further, an operational obligation arises only where the authority knows, or ought to know, of a "real and immediate risk" to the life of the particular individual: see the House of Lords decision in Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11. [read post]
