Search for: "Jackson v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
This can be easily done by issuing a much narrower, and quite correct opinion that Jack Smith lacks defendant's standing in Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Texas, involving alleged sex discrimination in juror selection (over the dissent of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson); six-time relist McKesson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Welty, Capital Case Handbook, 22-23 (3rd ed. 2013); Jessica Smith, North Carolina Crimes, 87 (7th ed. 2012). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Jackson is not an advocate of critical race theory, but she certainly is a member of a race, is she not? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:34 am
In the two years since the Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
Jackson, COA23-727, ___ N.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
McElrath v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Jackson, COA22-280, ___ N.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
He didn't invoke Smith or Mouat or Free Enterprise Fund. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:22 am
” Justice Kagan, along with Justice Jackson, wrote in a separate dissent in which she expressed her inclination to grant Smith’s petition for review. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]