Search for: "Jackson v. State of Georgia*" Results 181 - 200 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
LA Lafayette Cajuns by 25.5 LA Lafayette 49-7 LA Lafayette 42-7 Jackson State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7747, Jackson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am by John Floyd
”   End of Modern, Progressive State   President Trump has made it unmistakably clear that he wants to overrule Roe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Brewer, Henry Billings Brown, George Shiras, and Howell Edmund Jackson. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stacey Gray argued that the American Data Privacy and Protection Act would provide protections that are stronger than state protections, establishing a strong national standard for privacy. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
After a decision from the Marshall Court involving the Cherokee Indians and the state of Georgia, Jackson reportedly said, “John Marshal has made his decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:25 pm by cdw
In  Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:44 pm by Steve Hall
  The 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Ford v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Alabama, 10-9646 and Jackson v. [read post]