Search for: "Jackson v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm by Amy Howe
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, was already positioned to be one of the highest-profile arguments of the 2021-22 term, because the state had specifically asked the court to overrule its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The cert petition in essence asks the Court to overturn Jackson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm by NARF
Taylor (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Pollard, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Jackson:  University Press of Mississippi, 2005. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The Jackson Hole Star Tribune has this story on Wilkie v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit today vacated the order of Judge Taylor in ACLU v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See §§40 - 45 of the Civil Service Law** McKee v Jackson, 152 AD2d 54*** Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03043.htm [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See §§40 - 45 of the Civil Service Law** McKee v Jackson, 152 AD2d 54*** Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03043.htm [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]