Search for: "Jaffe v. Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
In preparing a more detailed paper on errors in Innovation and Its Discontents (Jaffe and Lerner, Princeton University Press, 2004), I revisited the brief of eBay in the eBay v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:14 am
The petition I want to flag (which the Court also acted on this morning) is Jaffe v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
In these quick hitters by Jaffe and Lerner, the 90% grant rate argument (unmentioned in the Dreyfuss article) plays a significant role. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
The case, Rockaway Commons, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am
The highest-profile new grant came in Toca v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am
In Hobbick v Zegans 2018 NY Slip Op 32180(U) September 5, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159172/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe the answer is no. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:26 am
In Komolov v Popik 2020 NY Slip Op 30909(U) April 7, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155100/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe determines that both prior Supreme Court judges and Appellate Division panels made fundamental mistakes. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
Of course, en banc review is rarely granted by the DC Circuit, but given that it recently granted the government’s motion for en banc review of the statutory interpretation case of Halbig v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:31 am
We are very grateful to Professor Jaffe for sharing his ongoing work with us. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
The Court’s announcement that it had granted review in Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
One of the occupational hazards of studying remedies is that the Court will often grant certiorari on remedial questions only to have them disappear because of how the question of standing or merits was resolved (e.g., Summer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Since Lockheed's sheets were partially manufactured in Japan, the court ruled that the US has no liability under Section 1498(a).Zoltek has petitioned for a grant of certiorari, arguing that the CAFC decision "strips an entire class of property owners - patent holders - of their Fifth Amendment right to just compensation for the taking of their patent rights. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
Frakes & Wasserman's new results seem to give us much more confidence that #3 is the correct answer.One is dealing with a correlation "granting more patents" to "granting bad patents. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Creditors' and Debtors' Rights Jaffe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Jaffe, Orin S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am
In February 2009, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Sage dismissing the complaint. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In Bliss v. [read post]
