Search for: "Jaffee, in Re" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2008, 6:43 am
People can set the copyright and Creative Commons licensing, so it is very clear whether we can re-use each others' presentations. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
"Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence authorizes federal courts to define new privileges by interpreting common law principles.'‚¬Jaffee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:36 am
In In re Seagate Technology, LLC (August 20, 2007), en banc the Federal Circuit overruled Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Bob Ambrogi
“Free, accessible, and comprehensive access to the law is foundational to our democracy, and we believe we’re in a moment when big progress can be made. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Michael Elliot Jaffe, Esq., Pazer, Epstein, & Jaffee, P.C., 20 Vesey St., NYC 10007. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:20 am
Scott Jaffee Controller No The purpsose is to attract clients who pay for legal services. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run   June 22, 2008. [read post]