Search for: "James Baker v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Andrew Thomas
United States District Court for the Central District of California Filed January 23, 2019, Case: 2:19-cv-00505   On January 23, 2019, James Baker, a.k.a. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by The Editors
Resolving a current split amongst multiple federal circuits, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by The Editors
Resolving a current split amongst multiple federal circuits, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Lars Phillips (Crowley Fleck PLLP), Austin Markus James (Montana Secretary of State Chief Legal Counsel), and Erin L. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court held that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the justices held 7-2 that, by failing to exhibit religious neutrality when it required a Christian baker to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, a state commission violated the baker’s free-exercise rights. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow:… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]