Search for: "James Sheehan"
Results 81 - 91
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
District Court Judge James Boasberg concluded that the vast majority of the messages Perry exchanged, some with other members of Congress, some with members of the Trump administration, and some with allies outside of government, could not be shielded from prosecutors by Perry’s constitutional protections as a member of Congress. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:21 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Cooke (FJC Director), and Alan Tomkins and Reggie Sheehan, both of the National Science Foundation (NSF). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
James, W. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
Jean Sheehan asked Barr to justify the inquiry, he stated that “spying on a political campaign is a big deal” and “did occur” in the 2016 Trump campaign inquiry, and that “[t]he question was whether it was adequately predicated. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
What Is AI and Why Does It Matter for National Security? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 4:44 pm
Duke Law professor James Coleman, former chief counsel to the House Ethics Committee, later wrote that these Nifong-mandated procedural irregularities "strongly suggest[ed] that the purpose of the identification process was to give the alleged victim an opportunity to pick three members of the lacrosse team who could be charged. [read post]
