Search for: "James v. Railroad Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
His clients included one of the most famous 19th-century railroad tycoons, Jay Gould, who at one point controlled the largest railroad company in the country. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
On July 27, 1934, Harry James Tompkins lost his arm, supposedly when an unsecured refrigerator car door on a train operated by the Erie Railroad Company hit him in the head. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
On July 27, 1934, Harry James Tompkins lost his arm, supposedly when an unsecured refrigerator car door on a train operated by the Erie Railroad Company hit him in the head. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:32 am
On Monday I wrote about the legal legacy of Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
Frye, University of Kentucky College of Law, has posted The Ballad of Harry James Tompkins, which is forthcoming in the Akron Law Review:On July 27, 1934, Harry James Tompkins lost his arm, supposedly when an unsecured refrigerator car door on a train operated by the Erie Railroad Company hit him in the head. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
Nevertheless, after the reports of the 1858 gold discovery, Kansas Governor James W. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-6262, James v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 4:08 am
B & O Railroad Co., 652 F.2d 1012 (D.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
The insurance companies will not help. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Co., 16 N.J. 180, 185 (1954) (slip onsmooth stairway in railroad station).Williams v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm
From its earliest days it has been the East Coast’s team in southeast Texas, representing Northern brokerage houses, utilities, lumber companies and other absentee landlords, and railroads. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The asymmetries run beyond the usual problem of state subsidies to that of states being tempted to tilt markets in favor of SOEs (producing a sort of systemic corruption in markets driven systems) to issues of interference with sovereignty when SOEs serve as the apex enterprise in global production chains.[18] The legal status of SOEs varies from being a part of government to stock companies with a state as a regular stockholder.[19] But its purpose has remained constant—national… [read post]
