Search for: "James v. Strange" Results 181 - 200 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Take the example of carriage taxes at issue in the 1796 Supreme Court case of Hylton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Drug Policy Nora Demleitner, Washington and Lee University School of Law, Drug Courts: Not a Public Health Solution Katherine Drabiak, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Questioning Medication Assisted Treatment James Hodge, Arizona State University College of Law, Supervised Injection Facilities: Legal and Policy Reforms Daniel Orenstein, University of California San Francisco, Grassroots of Grass: Cannabis Legalization Ballot Initiative Campaign Contributions and… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
It can depend a little bit on strange situations like the pandemic. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Jefferson--my favorite president in US History.Eric Muller posted a "cool" letter he found relating to the Gibbons v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
At the center of the AP piece was a would-be suicide bomber, whom authorities strangely had not apprehended. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Strangely, Halbach’s car had not yet been found. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
While it would seem strange to us now in Canada, it was once argued that in-house lawyers should not be allowed to give legal advice to their employers because their independence of judgment would be comprised by their employment[6]. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
The founding generation was also worried about two other kinds of military threat – armed insurrection against state governments from within or, strange though it may seem to us now, invasions of one state by another state or confederation of states. [read post]