Search for: "Jansen v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2017, 1:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The work of Leibniz was more directed to differential calculus and Newton more concerned with integration.Other work of Leibniz pre-saged much work of Alan Turing, which is curiously cited in Ten Law Professors’ Brief in Trading Technologies v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:56 am by INFORRM
No positive obligation on States: the Court had found that Article 10 did not confer on a State positive obligations to collect and disseminate information of its own motion (Guerra and Others v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:56 am by Nani Jansen Reventlow
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a recent landmark decision, Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:48 am
This moggy has just finished reading his copy of Mr Justice Birss’s decision Accord Healthcare Limited v. medac Gesellschaft [2016] EWHC 24 (Pat). [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:11 pm
United Mexican States Cecily Rose, Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Influences, and Findings of Corruption: Metal-Tech Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:22 pm by Afro Leo
We are very grateful to publish a guest post from Adv Mabel Jansen (Senior Counsel) on the inaugural lecture of Dr Dean in his capacity as the Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 10:24 pm by Barry Barnett
Jansen, 3 U.S. 133, 157 (1795) (emphasis ours). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 am
Jansen Calamita, The Making of Europe’s International Investment Policy: Uncertain First StepsRoman Petrov, Energy Community As a Promoter of the European Union’s ‘Energy Acquis’ to Its NeighbourhoodSara Poli, The Legal Standing of Private Parties in the Area of State Aids After the Appeal in Commission v. [read post]