Search for: "Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees" Results 81 - 100 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 10:41 am by justia.admin
State, County and Municipal Employees, where her dissent accused the majority of “weaponizing the First Amendment, in a way that unleashes judges, now and in the future, to intervene in economic and regulatory policy. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:41 am by justia.admin
State, County and Municipal Employees, where her dissent accused the majority of “weaponizing the First Amendment, in a way that unleashes judges, now and in the future, to intervene in economic and regulatory policy. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, decided in 2018. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am by Deborah La Fetra
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:27 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which “the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require workers who are not members to help pay for collective bargaining,” “could deal a crushing blow to organized labor. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am by Andrew Hamm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, and whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME)[6] and National Institute of Family & Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME)[6] and National Institute of Family & Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm by Richard M. Re
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, March 21, 2017, Posner, R.). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:14 am by Amy Howe
Janus – who is not a union member – challenged the $45 per month that is deducted from his paycheck to go to the local branch of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the union that represents him. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, holding that public-sector employees who are represented by a union to which they do not belong cannot be required to pay a fee to cover collective-bargaining costs, by striking down mandatory attorney bar dues. [read post]