Search for: "Jason Dean Short" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Update:  Dean Post discusses the book on a Digging a Hole podcast with David Schleicher and Samuel Moyn.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Here Are the Other States Where Trump’s Ballot Eligibility Faces a Challenge Las Vegas Sun – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 12/21/2023 The decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to disqualify Donald Trump from holding office again was the first victory for a legal effort that is still unfolding across the country. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
How the Supreme Court Settled on an Ethics Code – and What It Left Out MSN – Ann Marimow and Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 11/15/2023 Supreme Court justices stung by controversies over the court’s ethics pledged to follow a broad code of conduct promoting “integrity and impartiality,” but without a way to enforce its standards against those who fall short. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In my columns, I cited with approval a two-part Verdict series by Illinois Law's Dean Vikram Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In my column last Thursday, I cited a Verdict column by Illinois Law’s Dean Vik Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We have not yet had a chance to carefully read Dean Chemerinsky’s book, and thus cannot say whether it makes a valuable contribution. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We offer no view here on whether Dobbs was correct or not in overturning precedent and repudiating a right to abortion (although we both do think that the Dobbs majority opinion fell short in its analysis of arguments grounded in equal protection for retaining the right recognized in Roe and Casey). [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
It is true that Justice Garman’s second ten-year term was slated to end this fall, and that Justice Holder White will be in the seat at least until 2024, but extending one’s term (by tapping a hand-picked protégé successor) for a few years is nothing like a U.S Supreme Court Justice being able to choose a replacement who might serve (and extend the original Justice’s influence) for another four or five decades.Of course, Justice Holder White might have some benefit of… [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One of this series, we began discussing a lawsuit filed by Oklahoma attorney Stephen Jones in the Oklahoma Supreme Court seeking to prevent the state from holding a special election this year to replace U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In short, the Fifth Circuit’s reasoning—that the presence of state authority suggests the absence of federal power—is a quintessential non sequitur.And third, the Fifth Circuit seems to be troubled that ETS “commandeers U.S. employers. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Two weeks ago the Republican Minority Leaders in both Houses of the Illinois legislature (known as the General Assembly), in their official capacity and as individual registered voters, brought suit in federal district court in McConchie v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:06 pm by William Ford, Matt Gluck
Michael Green, senior vice president for Asia and Japan chair at CSIS, will deliver opening remarks, and panelists Jason Chung, senior adviser to the Project on Prosperity and Development at CSIS; Col. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
But if only 55 senators really believe that the trial is constitutional, they are likely to fall well short of the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump, a fact that was immediately noted by everyone. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Gold and Hasstedt also highlight the financial benefits of Title X and suggest that cutting the program is “short-sighted. [read post]
This result, while surely welcomed by the plaintiffs, would fall short of their primary litigation objective: to sink the whole ACA from stem to stern.To support this broadside, the Solicitor General (SG) offers an intriguing alternative basis for standing that would permit a more extensive attack. [read post]