Search for: "Jason E. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
Independence Houses, Bronx Jason Lewis Case 722/10 formerly associated with the 3rd fl., 3340 Bailey Avenue, Ft. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Sir David Davis MP has tabled a number of far reaching amendments [pdf] to the Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation Bill [pdf] which returns to the House of Commons for its Committee Stage on 8 May 2024. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
Harper, Wide right: why the NCAA’s policy on the American Indian mascot issue misses the mark, 9 UNIVERSITY MARYLAND LAW JOURNAL OF RACE, RELIGION, GENDER & CLASS 135 (2009)Ross E. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:31 pm
– Fort Meyers attorney Mark Trank of Becker & Poliakoff on the firm’s blog, Business Litigation Perspectives Marriage and the Workplace – Not Always a Perfect Match – West Bloomfield lawyer Jason Shinn of E-Business Counsel on his blog, Michigan Employment Law Advisor Is Litigation War? [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm
The ANDYs – Honoring the Heroes of Advertising – New York lawyer Ronald Urbach of Davis & Gilbert on his blog, Madison Ave Insights The EEOC’s Proposed Wellness Plan Regulation: Some Progress, But Issues Persist – Paul H. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Recently published scholarship includes:Douglas E. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:38 pm
JASON BRILL, JACQUELINE MITCHELL | JANUARY FEBRUARY 2023 Row 1: Caroline Smith DeWaal, James Marsden, Darin Detwiler, Lisa Robinson, Rosa DeLauro, Barack Obama. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:50 am
You Have To Admire the Persistence of E&Y’s Partners (Anthony Nitti) [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Two weeks ago the Republican Minority Leaders in both Houses of the Illinois legislature (known as the General Assembly), in their official capacity and as individual registered voters, brought suit in federal district court in McConchie v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week a good friend of the law school where both of us teach (the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign), Illinois Supreme Court Justice Rita Garman, announced she was stepping down effective July 7, 2022. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
Jason Mazzone is the Albert E. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Some commentators have floated that idea that it would be permissible and advisable for the Senate sitting in the matter of President Trump’s impeachment to adopt a rule of private (that is, unreported to the public) voting on the question of whether the President ought to be convicted of the articles of impeachment adopted by the House. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Jason Mazzone is the Albert E. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Davis, which require proof of invidious intent. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
And the other, Amar, has, as Dean, been on the hiring committee at Illinois for each of the past eight years, and for the several years prior to that on the hiring committee at the UC Davis Law School, a peer institution, as its Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In this vein it bears noting that nothing in HLR’s description of its membership selection process remotely suggests that these 18 slots are reserved for persons of a particular race or gender (in the way the UC Davis scheme struck down in Bakke set aside 16 medical school admission slots for ethnic minorities, such that whites could not compete for these slots).The Michigan Law School’s plan upheld in Grutter used a holistic assessment process for the entire law school class… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
The Murder of Jason Erie Murphy was convicted in August 1998 for the capital murder of Jason Erie. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Holloman and Sara E. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Earlier this week, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 826, a landmark measure that requires each publicly held corporation whose principal executive offices are located in California to have, by the end of 2019, at least one woman on its board of directors. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Davis case where the Court explained that proof of disparate impact plus proof of invidious motive could result in the invalidation of a facially neutral law. [read post]
