Search for: "Jay Levine"
Results 221 - 240
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
By Jared Klaus and Jay Levine Following the expiration of a public comment period last week, the ink is now dry on the Federal Trade Commission’s consent decree against Made in USA Brand, LLC, settling charges that the Columbus, Ohio-based company sold its “Made in USA” certification label to product-sellers without making any attempt to verify whether the companies’ products were actually made in the USA. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:22 am
By Jared Klaus and Jay Levine Following the expiration of a public comment period last week, the ink is now dry on the Federal Trade Commission’s consent decree against Made in USA Brand, LLC, settling charges that the Columbus, Ohio-based company sold its “Made in USA” certification label to product-sellers without making any attempt to verify whether the companies’ products were actually made in the USA. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
By Jay Levine and Darcy Jalandoni This podcast discusses the background and potential legal implications, particularly on state licensing boards, of North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
By Jay Levine and Jetta Sandin As we have explained in the past, parties to a merger or acquisition must report the transaction to federal antitrust authorities – the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) – provided the parties and the transaction exceed certain thresholds. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:24 am
By Allen Carter and Jay Levine The FTC sent a message to “patent trolls” earlier this month, though how well that message will resonate remains to be seen. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 8:55 am
By Jay Levine and Allen Carter The FTC sent a message to “patent trolls” earlier this month, though how well that message will resonate remains to be seen. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
By Darcy Jalandoni My colleague and friend Jay Levine was recently interviewed by HealthLeaders Media on a case we covered in a recent post (North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
Wiley of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Health Law & Policy Matters Racial talk at work? [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 7:39 am
By Darcy Jalandoni and Jay Levine One of the most important cases the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:13 am
By Jason Starling , Molly Crabtree and Jay Levine Nobody likes paying legal fees for compliance matters. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Nevada: “NV Ethics Commission Director Resigns” by Jay Bartos on KNPR News. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:10 am
By Jay Levine and Allen Carter Have to give them an “A” for effort. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
By Jay Levine and Allen Carter Have to give them an “A” for effort. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:11 pm
By Jay Levine and Jetta Sandin This podcast offers a brief introduction into the world of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, more commonly referred to as the HSR Act. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
To find out a lot more on the blog, be sure to check out my interview with Jay Levine, the blog’s editor, as he explains that antitrust law covers such a broad range of subjects and that the podcasts give them a chance to show their personality. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:18 pm
Also, over on LXBN TV, Jay Levine joins me to discuss the revamped Antitrust Law Source. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:26 am
For those of you who are frequent readers of this blog you may recall two recent blog posts by Jay Levine (editor of the Antitrust Law Source blog) and Jason Starling that address some recent examples of how antitrust law and employment law can intersect. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
By Jetta Sandin and Jay Levine Almost 40 years ago, Congress passed the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”). [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 6:19 am
Jay Levin, in October 2012. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:47 am
By Jay Levine and Jason Starling We previously discussed here the antitrust case involving several high-tech companies who allegedly entered into bilateral agreements in which they agreed not to solicit each other’s employees. [read post]
