Search for: "Jefferson v. Public Safety "
Results 21 - 40
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm
Everson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am
The lessons of the past in general health and safety practices are easy to read. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am
It has often been rumored that the Texas Department of Public Safety allows the flow of drugs into the state so it can seize the drug profits leaving the state for Mexico. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
From Alabama Gas Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:31 am
LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Can a person carry a long gun for self-defense in public in D.C.? [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
0306 (DDB) (Chief Justice Jefferson not sitting) Texas Department of Public Safety v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:19 am
Image via WikipediaIn its 16-page decision last week in Jason Riley & The Courier-Journal, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
Mason v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
JEFFERSON COUNTY Criminal Practice Charge of VTL Ã'§1192(3) Dismissed Against Defendant As Intoxication by Alcohol, Not Drugs, Required People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Rebollar v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
The opinion has an interesting discussion of whether the presumption against federal preemption applies in the traffic-safety context, distinguishing the Court’s preemption decision Geier v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decisions in Roe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
In response to the government's suggestion that disclosure of the letter would endanger public safety, Marshall concluded that, if true, this claim could furnish a reason for withholding it, but that the court, rather than the Executive Branch alone, was entitled to make the public safety determination after examining the letter. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am
As Jefferson explained: “In this state of the evidence, delivered sometimes, too, under the restriction of private confidence, neither safety nor justice will permit the exposing names, except that of the principal actor, whose guilt is placed beyond question. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 pm
As the Supreme Court famously stated in Armstrong v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
